Sunday, December 13, 2009

Something With Immense Value In The Future

ABROAD


(Treasury of Saint Tikhon of spiritual Zadonck)

Whoever leaves his home and his homeland to settle a new land is about to live in abroad, passing traveler. In this world of calamity away from the heavenly homeland, the Christian is also an alien, a traveler passing through. We have here no lasting city, but we seek the the future, says the holy Apostle Paul (Hb.13, 14). David also confesses I am a stranger with You, a pilgrim, as well as all my fathers (Ps.38: 14). And he adds in his prayer: I am a stranger on earth, do not hide Your commandments (Ps.118: 19).

The man who was exiled in a foreign land is stepping up efforts to achieve the goal that motivated the exile. Christians, called by the Word of God and renewed by the Holy Baptism for eternal life also increases the effort not to be deprived of it because it is won or lost in this world.

The man who lives in a foreign land is acting with fear, as it evolves in unknown environments. The Christian is afraid of everything in this world: it guards against evil spirits, sin, illusions, wicked and ungodly.

All deviate from abroad and are wary of him because he is not one of them. Those who love the world, the son of this century, moving away as the true Christian and hate him because his conduct is opposed to theirs. The Lord says elsewhere: if you were the world, the world would love his own good, but because you are not the world, but I chose you out of the world, the world hates you (Jn.15, 19). It is said that the sea does not keep the bodies, but rejects them. The fickle world, too, rejects the pious souls, dead to the world. Whoever loves the world is his brainchild, but he who despises his desires is illusory enemy.

man passing in a strange land acquisition is not: neither house or garden, or anything like that, except the bare necessities of life. The true Christian knows that nothing in this world is immutable: it must abandon everything, even his own body. We brought nothing into the world as well, we can carry nothing out (1Tim.6, 7). That is why the true Christian seeks nothing else in this world than necessary, according to the words of the Apostle: therefore when we have food and raiment, let us be satisfied (1Tim.6, 8).

The alien return to his homeland with movable property, such as money or goods. Movable property that the true Christian can carry with him into the other world are his good works. They are the ones that seek to raise here, such as a commodities trader who acquires spiritual. With them also he will appear before the Heavenly Father. To this we called the Lord Lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroy, where thieves break in and steal that (mt.6, 20).

The son of this world are concerned about the corruptible body, but the pious care about the immortal soul. The son of this world are searching for temporal and earthly treasures, but the pious souls yearn for things eternal and heavenly that eye has not seen, nor ear heard them, and which are not mounted in the heart of man (1Cor.2, 9). Gazing with the eye of faith this wonderful treasure and inconceivable, they despise all earthly riches.

The son of the world run after the glory of this world, but true Christians seek the glory of heaven, their true homeland. The son of the world adorn the body with valuable clothes, but the son of the Kingdom of God seeking to decorate their immortal soul with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience (Col.3, 12). The son of this world are fools and madmen, they seek that which has no value. The son of the Kingdom are reasonable and wise, they are interested in what holds the eternal bliss.

bored foreigner away from his homeland, the true Christian is boring and painful to live in this world. For him, everything here below is reverberates with exile, banishment or prison, since it is far from his heavenly home. Woe to me because my exile lasted , "said David (Ps.119: 5) surrounded by the chorus of sighs of all the saints.

bored foreigner in a foreign land, but it is good because he remembers what motivates his exile. The true Christian too bored in this world, but bear it as God directs, keeping in mind the memory of his homeland. Jews exiled to Babylon from Jerusalem languished ever, they waited fervently return. True Christians are in this world on the shores of Babylon, sat weeping and groaning at the recollection of the heavenly Jerusalem (Ps.136). We are full of boldness and prefer to leave this body to go home with the Lord (2Cor.5, 8), Saint Paul says, sighing.

The son of the world attached to him as a country, a paradise, so they do not want to leave. But the son of the kingdom away from him by heart, and endure all sorts of hardships to reach their homeland, because for a true Christian, Life in this world is a suffering and a cross.

When the alien comes home, his parents, his neighbors and friends are looking forward to his return, greet him, wish him welcome. When the true Christian ended his pilgrimage here below, and comes to the heavenly homeland, the angels and saints welcome her arrival. When the stranger returns home, he saw no danger in peace. So the true Christian reached his heavenly home to rest, no longer afraid, and lives in bliss and joy.

So look, O Christian!

Our life here is nothing but a trip: the land is mine, saith the Lord , and you are to me as foreign and Breakfast (Lev.25, 23).

Our true homeland is not here but in heaven. For her we were created, called by the Word of God, and renewed by the Holy Baptism.

We must not, given our heavenly calling, look for land or property we attach, except for the necessities: food, clothing, shelter ...

The Christian should desire nothing else in this world that life eternal where your treasure is, there will your heart (mt.6, 21).

Whoever wants to be saved must detach his heart from the world until his soul has not migrated to the eternal habitations.

He who seeks wealth or fame he shows the world and not heaven for country: he understood his mistake the day he died ...

Deathwatch Robb Chapter Summerys

INNOCENT LIFE OF BISHOP Penza


"Russian athletes of piety in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries"

(Edition of Mount Athos)

Monk genuine scholar, and confessor of the Christian faith, the hierarch Innocent bore the name of Hilary before leaving the world. He was born May 30, 1784. His father was a clerk of a church in Pavlovsk, on the outskirts of Moscow.

Since childhood, Hilary showed great modesty. While studying at the seminary Perervinsky Moscow, he was also the name of Smirnov, which means calm, peaceful. When he had finished his theological studies, this time at the seminary of the Lavra, was appointed teacher. Four years later he was promoted to inspector. Feeling the monastic vocation, he received the tonsure in the same year. In 1810 he was appointed superior of the monastery Ougrech, and later the monastery Znamensky. In 1812 he was honored as winner of the theological sciences Theological Academy in St. Petersburg, and the rank of Archimandrite. In the capital, he distinguished himself by his gifts as a preacher. In 1813 he was rector of the theological seminary, a professor of the Academy, member of the Theological Censor, and superior of the monastery of St Sergius.

History Teacher of the Church, Archimandrite Innocent was unwilling to depend on foreign scholars, so he decided to personally verify events same historical sources, and compile their own notes. Thus arose under his pen an outline history of the Church of biblical times until the eighteenth century , work which was reprinted many times and soon formed the only reference book in seminaries . But there were other notable works, including theology active, the test comment on the first two psalms , and comment Symbol of Faith.

On holidays, Archimandrite Innocent withdrew to the monastery of St Sergius, and without preparation, pronounced sermons inspired. During those years, her service was continually rewarded: he was elevated to doctor of theology, Archimandrite of the first order, superior of the Monastery of Novgorod-Iourev, and even received the Medal of St. Vladimir Equal-to Apostles, the second degree. However, this is not so much activity outside of this extraordinary man who deserves attention, but his precious inner life.

Since his youth, aspired Innocent the ascetic life. One day, during a reading, he was struck by the portrait of a true servant of the faith as a brush Saint Paul in his epistle to Timothy. Therefore, he began to pay particular attention to himself. As he was very humble and deeply penetrated the consciousness of his unworthiness, he began to judge harshly. His piety soon changed into a strong spiritual feeling, which made him fear any word or action unfair, and engage in a constant battle against the subtle movements of the pride and pleasure. Name of the Lord became for him a weapon at all times. Her fervor was so intense he was often away from a reading or an interview to hide her tears. He loved to teach people simple, and sought to noticing what his faults. If noted in others a sincere desire of amendment, he scolded. His intellect was so pervasive that it seemed to guess the secret thoughts or desires of his interlocutors. It also revealed some hidden sins. To those who sought from him some instruction, he set forth the absolute need to remember anywhere, any time of the Name of Jesus Christ: "The Name of Jesus Christ like a flaming weapon in the hands of the Seraphim, protects us from attacks of temptation. This single, large, and priceless name remains in our hearts! It is in our mind and our memory, our imagination, our eyes and our ears, the doors and the doorway at the table and on our couch. It will make our spirit strong in front of the enemy, we will grant eternal life, and teach us wisdom without the aid of any reasoning. " He also taught the invisible power of the sign of the Cross. Fleeing the fire as the empty words, he repeated to himself: "Innocent, remember that thou shalt be justified or condemned by your words! "(Mt.12, 37)

When he taught, Archimandrite not looking eloquence, however, his words were always lively impression of strength and vigor. During the Divine Office, we perceived that he was standing before the Lord Himself. It betrayed the intense prayer of his heart to the sighs and tears that punctuated his ecphonèses.

Innocent could not endure the judgments. One day they made him part of infamous slanders about him, he replied: "Do not blame the brother, but please! How could I be upset with my enemy? My clothes even he is not there to remind me of the lack of rancor small children? "So he cut short any conversation about the faults of others.

Innocent deeply saddened of the moat that separated the life of Christian duty. He was amazed at what people spend time in the theater of divine to spend much money, and that the rich are reluctant to give a penny for the care of churches.

One day, a poor ragged hermit visited Innocent, who offered him of his clothing. As the hermit refused, Archimandrite said: "Brother, if you do not accept this garment in the name of the Lord, I give to a poor or a brother on the road." The monk finally agreed and concluded by saying: "Now you got me dressed. Will come when you impoverish yourself: then the Lord will clothe. Then I think you accomplished for the floor: giver to the poor lends to God and receive a hundredfold . This prophecy is fulfilled in his time.

A night burned continually before the icons of the cell Innocent. Despite the weakness of his body, exhausted by toil and fasting, he would often say to their knees in prayer of the publican: God, be merciful to me a sinner!

activity of Innocent at St. Petersburg lasted seven years. It was surprising by the complexity and diversity of tasks: he was the time administrator, teacher, critic, researcher, senior preacher, ascetic and spiritual father. But this bright torch began to run out yet. The intellectual effort overworking his fragile health. One night, tired from the preparation of notes next day he lay on the ground near the lectern to wake up quickly to conclude its work. But he caught cold, became seriously ill, and could never really recover.

capabilities, reputation and activity of Innocent presaged a brilliant career. According to custom, after one or two appointments, he would probably be called a cathedra famous and historic, where his work could reach great heights. But the Lord gave His servant worthy of an early finish his working life and, moreover, not to finish in glory, but the tribulations incurred for the truth.

During the reign of Alexander I, Russian high society enjoyed a passion for what we then called the spiritual Christianity. This erroneous teaching, often opposed to Orthodoxy, leaning to the negation of the Church and gave birth to unhealthy mysticism sects, the precursor of heretical tendencies emerged thereafter. This movement was protected by the President of the Holy Synod, Prince Golitsyn, a very influential figure.

The heart of the Archimandrite Innocent was hurt to see this teaching spread. It is also not embarrassed to express his opinion on the books that were broadcasting: "The Christian who will not judge soundly enough tears to be paid on injuries that can open these books in schools. Full aberrations and fallacies of psychological harm if they reason that the soul shudders at such a reading. "

In 1818, a Stanovitch wrote a book entitled interview on the grave of a little child about the immortality of the soul, which will bring consolation if a foundation for the faith of the Church accurate. This book pointedly criticized the fallacies of the so-called spiritual Christianity that hawked periodicals and translations. Archimandrite Innocent was forced to browse the book Stanovitch in his capacity of censor. Full of zeal for the purity of the faith, he said according to the doctrine of the Orthodox Church.

Archimandrite Filaret, Metropolitan of Moscow future, advised to be cautious in Innocent disapproval of Christianity spiritual: "We archimandrites, we can not save the Church of errors infiltrate it and it is better to contact the Metropolitan, as his voice carries more weight than ours. " Innocent but considered that it had to act, even if his attempt does would not be successful, "Do not tell the truth means lacking courage. Should we not talk because you can not see the dawning success? Success is not our business, but that of the Lord! Our problem is to testify to the glory of the Lord! "

Stanovitch The book was published and aroused the indignation of the Prince Golitsyn, and revenge. The prince also knew from the beginning of Innocent disapproval. The author of the book, which was a poor helpless man, was expelled from Saint Petersburg. On 6 January 1819, the book was banned by the highest authority. A very severe remonstrance was made for Innocent "have unwisely authorized a work that tends to destroy the spirit of education within a Christian. Moreover, in its opinion on the immortality of the soul, the author relates the defense of our Greek-Russian Church only attacked anyone. This book is totally opposite to what guides our Christian government in the spiritual and civic life. "

It was now clear Innocent did not stay long in St. Petersburg. Despite this, the wind would turn six years later for the book Stanovitch with the new Minister of Education, which published the following decree: "Many books related to faith containing erroneous commentaries of the Holy Scriptures have been published privately without any examination of the Synod on the contrary, books written in the spirit of our Orthodox faith have suffered a severe ban. Thus, the book published under the title interview on the grave of a little child about the immortality of the soul was prohibited and set aside. This book has been reviewed and approved by the Metropolitan, and we hereby authorize its publication and its dissemination. "

In January 1819, the persecution raged against Innocent. You can have an idea of his impressions from the letters he sent to a dedicated. "It is nice to hear," he wrote on January 7, charges on which the conscience is at peace. " And January 8: "I do not reprimand, and my soul is even more weakened. By meeting the Prince at the palace on the day of Epiphany, I noticed that he was deeply offended. Between us, I prayed for him by offering to the Lord and bloodless sacrifice, I know not why, I prayed with tears of compunction. God grants it and the heart softened. Without peace between the prince and me, it would be difficult to appear at its meetings; he can not stand me. So should I be thrown out like garbage spiritual and the sweepings of St. Petersburg. If this pleases the Lord, surely for the good of all and especially for my good. It is sad that this poor author that I left past the work was expelled in twenty-four hours. I am the cause of this, fool me. If his book was not passed, it would still be there at his post, and at peace! "

Archimandrite Innocent was appointed to the cathedra of Orenburg and consecrated bishop on March 2 at the Cathedral of the Mother of God of Kazan. That day, his face beaming with spiritual joy. In the evening in his cell, he said to a monk: "I am an unworthy servant and was honored with the dignity of the holiest! "Then he sang a hymn of thanksgiving to the Most Holy, and then the hymn "Here is the Bridegroom who comes in the middle of the night." His eyes were full of tears. He ended by singing: "I see Thy bridal chamber, O my Savior! "

Innocent health was deteriorating more and more. "The road to Moscow is not very long," he wrote, but death is even closer. When will she? It is not known. But suddenly she comes ... On March 23, Metropolitan interceded with the Tsar was transferred to the Innocent cathedra of Penza and Saratov, because of the weakness of his nature and his ill health. He was urged to first go to Moscow to consecrate a bishop, following the death of the Archbishop of Moscow.

the day of departure, many people gathered to His Eminence Innocent. He offered one of his sermons to each of his disciples, saying: "I give you this in remembrance of me. Over time, comparing your work to mine, you can say as they wrote poorly once! I loved you and wanted to make you happy. But now I leave you confident God. Learn patience! "He left many items to her admirers. Then came the moment of departure. "At this moment I got into a car, pray that the Lord will sustain my weakness. How much weight on my head, my eyes, my mind, and more on my heart! How the Lord will bless he start this? I give him everything. That these arms are stretched to Him alone. That's my desire! "

The journey from Moscow completely exhausted Innocent performing the coronation, with difficulty:" I left Thursday with great difficulty for the nomination, and I came back half conscious. Sunday, I celebrated at the Cathedral of the Dormition and I perform the coronation. The Lord only gives the forces necessary to accomplish so great work. The audience questioned whether I could finish what I started. I trembled myself, half-conscious, hoping but hardly believing in the Lord's mercy ... After the end of the Liturgy, I had difficulty in regaining my carriage. I hardly remember how I came to the apartment where I treat myself. As I will not be cured, I will not go in Penza: they think the way they want! "The celebration at the Cathedral of the Dormition, icy this time of year, completely deteriorated health of Innocent. He had to spend three months in Moscow. It probably was suffering from dropsy. At first, it lacked everything. Subsequently, he received the care of pious people, touched by the suffering of the persecuted. Thus were fulfilled the words of the pilgrim. The biggest help came mainly from the Countess AA Orlov, who leaves the lasting memory of a devout Orthodox.

Innocent suffered a lot mentally. The storm that erupted over his head shook a lot this gentle soul, "There is a fear in me people, I'm afraid they might hurt me. It is the disease that creates the fear in me. " When at last the bishop could leave, the Countess was accompanied by a doctor, surrounded by all amenities, and assumed all expenses of travel. The trip took place in line. "Pray that the Lord bless my path and my life. It softens the disease so I can continue my earthly life I want, even intermittently, and the effect of His goodness, to His holy Name spend. "

June 21, Innocent came in Penza. The weather was beautiful. The crowd was gathered on each side of the road, near the cathedral and inside. All were concerned about the unhealthy aspect of the new bishop. The intense suffering had printed a large pallor on his face. Her voice trembled with weakness. After the service of thanksgiving, His Eminence gave a homily on the theme of peace.

Despite the illness, the new bishop left no Sunday or any holiday celebration without or sermon. His teachings greatly impressed his flock. He preached with tears. When he offered the bloodless sacrifice, he became animated with new life, especially when he invoked the coming of the Holy Spirit upon the gifts. He prostrated himself in tears, and despite the weight of vestments on his sickly body, it does not allow deacons to support it. He was absorbed in prayer so that once, after the singing of the cherubim, he did not even notice the commotion that won people to the news of a fire that broke out in the episcopal residence.

There was a lot of work to reorganize the diocese. The clergy was not up as expected. The episcopal residence was "like a cabin or a bad hostel": its floor is raised under the feet, the windows were broken and smoky, the rain passed through the roof. The ranger had taken possession of the lands of the bishopric. In short, everything was correct.

After inspecting churches and theological institutions of the city, the bishop began a tour across the diocese. It had great difficulty when he saw the poverty of the churches. Some had no Bible, nor any of the books needed for the celebration of the ecclesiastical cycle. They were sometimes only three or four vestments, including one in silk and other fabric. The visit to Saratov, however, made a good impression to the bishop. There were ten churches. At the cathedral, Archbishop Innocent was a sermon on the text: with me Magnify the Lord and exalt His name together . "When I pronounced the words magnify the Lord with me , I wanted to embrace everyone to magnify the Very High. The people were many. The cathedral, narthex and its square were full of people. "On the third day of his stay in Saratov, the bishop, totally exhausted, took to his bed.

Two weeks later, he returned to Penza, where he continued to look after the affairs of his diocese, and this even on his deathbed. Learning that the school board and would repeat his theological Church History he was concerned with the review. It's just if the doctor could convince take his medicine. The patient's eyes were constantly turned to the crucifix. A week before the end he gave a thousand rubles for the maintenance of poor students of church property in the district of Penza.

- Who should we thank?

- Jesus Christ!

He was so weakened he could not even lift a glass of water. Yet he did not let go until the end of the pen. The late fall and rain only increased his suffering. He had more than skin and bones. Emanated from him yet calm, compunction and reverence. He said he looked a lot like St. Dimitri of Rostov, "This is not a big deal to have a superficial similarity. If only the grace of God made me worthy to approach him in spirit! "

During this last illness, no one heard the patient push the slightest whimper. If someone sympathized, he cut short by saying: "God wills it! "The night of Oct. 9, he called his servant cell and told him: "What a wonderful vision I had! It seemed that the heavens had opened! Two young men dressed in bright whites are descended from the heights towards me, looked at me with love, took me with them myself so weak, and raised me to heaven. My heart was filled with joy unspeakable and I woke up! "

On 10 October morning, His Eminence asked the holy anointing, gathering her remaining strength to repeat the prayers and raise a little. Then his tongue began to go numb, his breathing stopped, and he crossed his arms over his chest. Those present for the release décroisèrent breathing, but he passed them again.

The suffering went on until six in the evening, but the face was peaceful. Then someone began to read the Psalter. In Psalm fifty-four, the tears flowed and heard the dying words: I cried out to God and the Lord answered me! Then when they heard me And Lord, I trust in You , Bishop Innocent heaved his last breath and his soul departed peacefully to God. So he fell asleep October 10, 1819, in his thirty-sixth year, seven months after being bishop, including three in his flock.

The funeral service, to the astonishment of all, was celebrated by his predecessor, then retired in Penza. The inspector of the seminary, Archimandrite Basil, later Bishop of Tobolsk, delivered a remarkable and touching speech: "Why hide from us so fast, light of our eyes? Why do you know your bed at the very dawn of your life? Scarcely if we had time - and some have not been - to give you the first kiss, and you demand the latest already. Rise up, good shepherd, and hear the cries of your children call you! Be careful with the sobs of orphans who dump at your feet with tears of gratitude! The slow recognition of the cores penetrated thy goodness has not had the time to offer a sacrifice worthy of you already that you give your soul to your sheep. What love can be higher and stronger than this one? Oh, if only our tears can revive your heart, as once they were revived by your words! But now he has fallen asleep And only the trumpet of the angel will have the strength to wake up! In vain our rebel yell come from disturbing your quiet rest, if necessary after all these labors. Receive the crown of righteousness awaits you for your faith and your spiritual feats! Unite yourself in spirit with the Lord, which thy mouth was ever the name, this name was also engraved in your heart. But do not abandon us, even after you left! "

Innocent was buried under the altar in the Cathedral of Kazan, Penza. The locals celebrate to this day offices for the repose of the soul their pastor. The memory of this zealous defender and right to the truth of Christ, this being dedicated and without malice, pure soul of this little child, the good shepherd, is kept by those who devoutly wish to treasure the integrity and purity of Orthodoxy.

Friday, December 11, 2009

Unlock Sony Dvp-sr200p/b

DIALOGUE BETWEEN A MONK AND LAY (continued)


(St. Ignatius Brianchaninov)

- Scandals, abruptly announced in detail, are the source of criticism against monks and monasteries.

- I agree. Do not think I want to hide the evil, then it affects everyone. On the contrary, I sincerely wish that evil was eradicated from the scope of Christ, and that the field produced only pure and ripe wheat. Again, it is essential to know precisely the divine economy in order to dissociate the abuse of human and act successfully against them. It is essential to see clearly on the question of evil in order to fight with appropriate means. Otherwise, we replace one evil with another evil, mistakes by others errors, abuse by other abuse, and we would go to trample, reject, and disfigure the divine economy, as did the Protestants against Rome. It is essential to know the art of medicine to find the appropriate and effective remedy. Otherwise, it imposes the death of the patient instead of the disease.

The view of the laity today on the monks in general is very unfair, since they are too separated from them, morally and spiritually. Among Christians living in the monastery and those who live in the world, there is always strongest link. The inhabitants of the monasteries are not from the moon or any planet. They come from the sinful world here below. The lack of moral conviction that attracts a monastery has its origin in the world. The decay of monasticism has its relations with the world and is linked very closely to the decay of the laity. The moral decay of monasticism is a consequence of the decline of morality and piety of the laity. Monasticism is based and built on Christianity. He grew weaker or according to the progress or weakening Christianity. The basic problem is Christianity itself: monasticism is just one aspect, a particular manifestation. The disease is common! Mourn him, then together, and concern us all heal! Manifest compassion and love for humanity! Let's ignore the cruel mutual condemnations, which are an attitude Pharisees to destroy the disease by hitting the patient with a beam!

- Your conception of moral bond between monks and laypeople is new to me. I understand that she comes to you from the experience otherwise it can not be so deep. The theory, reduced to itself, is often superficial. Expose me all this with more details, please.

- You're not mistaken. I will discuss here, partly the result of my own observations, and partly the result of my discussions with people who are absolutely trustworthy. Metropolitan Seraphim of St. Petersburg, during a conversation about the increasing divorce proceedings today, told me that when he was vicar bishop in Moscow, there were one or two consistory divorce proceedings a year. Old Archbishops at the time said there were none during their youth. Here is an example of the morality of the past. The sad path to the current situation is grim and fast. The stories of the old monks confirm the findings of the Metropolitan. At the beginning of the century, we saw back in the monasteries of virgins lot of people who did not know the taste of wine, people who abstained from worldly celebrations, do not read secular books, and had been educated by reading Scriptures and the writings of the Fathers, attendance flawlessly churches of God, and other pious habits. They brought to the monastery a moral right, which was not shaken by depraved habits. They brought in a monastery health had not been damaged by excess, they were able to withstand asceticism, work, and deprivation. The severe piety of the world educating monks severe and strong, both by the soul from the body.

Now Christianity weakened produces low monks. It is very rare to see a man go blank at the monastery, or a person who has not usually depraved. We see rather feeble, degraded soul and body, whose imagination and memory are congested with novels and other books of the same nature, beings who are full of meaning and enjoyment of having acquired taste of all these temptations that fill the world. They enter the monastery with sinful habits ingrained with a dull consciousness, put to death by a kind of life that allows all the iniquities and all the deceit to cover them. These people have to lead a very tough battle against themselves, because of deep rooting depraved habits, their lack of sincerity, their inability to even be sincere. It is very difficult to educate such people. These people enter the monastery, take off their clothes to wear clothes lay monastic, but they retain the habits and mindset of the world, if not satiated, acquire renewed strength. According to the Word of God, the sinful habits that can weaken the faith and fighting. Otherwise, when the opportunity presents itself, starving the habit, which has kept its power over man, falls on it with greed and transportation. The monasteries were once safe havens for those who were morally sick. But they have changed over time, and have lost their merits. For example, after being installed by their founders in a deep desert or at least away from the world, they now find themselves in the midst of the world and its many temptations, because of population growth. Moreover, it is no longer sufficient to cross the gates of the monastery to avoid meeting the temptation to which we are unable to resist, because today, the temptation has raided the monastery with fury, producing havoc and mischief. The anti-monastic spirit seen as a triumph for the intrusion attempts within the same monastery. Because of the lack of morality in today's world, it is more necessary to build the monasteries away from the world.

When the life of the world was united with the Church, the piety of the laity no different from that of the monks, except by marriage and acquisitions. It was natural to build monasteries in the middle of cities, monasteries, and these did not fail produced many saints. But now, special attention should be paid to the exhortation of the Apostle (2Cor.6, 17): Come out middle of these people and stay away, says the Lord. Do not touch anything unclean, and I will receive you.

- Many believe it could significantly diminish the temptations offered by a law that prohibits the entry of young people in monasteries. The latter suffer greatly because of their habit outside and are full of passion. We could book entry for adults and monasteries old.

- This measure is reasonable in appearance. Instead of protecting and raising monasticism, it would destroy it forever. Monasticism is the science of sciences. In him, theory and practice go hand in hand on a holy path from beginning to end by the Gospel. On this track, with the help of heavenly light, moving from an activity, outside the vision of yourself. The right vision of oneself brings the Gospel is clearly proven by the inner experience, which itself confirms convincingly the truth of the Gospel. Science of sciences, monasticism provides, in the language of scientists in this world, the most accurate knowledge, the deepest and highest of the theology of experimental psychology, that is to say knowledge living of man and God, as long as this knowledge is accessible to humans.

To access the science of this world, requires new skills, receptivity total energy of a soul intact. All this is even more essential for successful learning science Science, monasticism. A fight against nature awaits the monk. The best age to begin this fight is adolescence. The teenager is still shackled by habit and in him the good will is still fairly open. Experience shows that the best are those monks enter the monastery in their early youth. Much of today's monks are young entered the monastery, very little in adulthood, let alone in old age. Those who enter the monastery in adulthood or old age are often unable to withstand the monastic life and returned to the world without having understood what monasticism. And those who stay at the monastery are almost exclusively an outward piety, merely to accomplish outside the monastic rules that appeal to both lay and enough to satisfy them. It is very rare to find in them an understanding of the monastic spirit.

Taking the teaching of Holy Church. My son, from thy youth up and your hair white, selected education, and you will find wisdom. As the farmer and the sower, and cultivates wisdom relies on fruit excellent (Sir.6 0.18 to 19). Rejoice, young man, in your youth, be happy in the days of your youth on the ways of your heart and the desires of your eyes (Eccl.11, 9) is the wisdom that I have cherished and sought from my youth, I tried to take her to wife, and I'm enamored of his youth. She shattered her noble birth by living with God as the Master of all he loved her: she is in fact initiated the science of God and His chosen one who works (Wisdom of Solomon 8.2 to 4 ). According to the Holy Fathers, these sentences of Scripture concerning the science of sciences, monastic life, and not the wisdom taught in the world by the prince of this world. After saying in his fortieth rule it is very beneficial to focus on God while fleeing from the madding crowd, the Sixth Ecumenical Council, however, recommended with the discernment to know tonsured appropriate and in any case, not before the age of ten, so that the spiritual capabilities have reached a sufficient development. Reading the lives of the saints shows that the majority of the monks enter the monastery at the age of twenty. Rooted in his habits and his way of thinking, blunted in its capacity, old age is regarded by the Fathers as unfit to monastic life; ascetic feat of youth it is no longer accessible. St. Anthony the Great began by refusing the tonsure to Paul the Simple, at the age of sixty years, the registrant unfit to monastic life. Many fathers, entered the monastery since childhood, reached a high degree of spiritual success. The child still has the integrity of his free will, his purity, his attraction to good, and responsiveness. So it was St. Sabbas the Sanctified, San Simeon Mount Admirable and many others.

- The firmness of will, free will led a determined manner towards its goal, are essential to the success of the spiritual life. It is necessary to locate them in time with him who desires take the monastic habit.

- Right. From ancient times until today, there has always been very careful in receiving applicants for the monastery. However, the strong will and genuine good will appear only after some time. Very often, people differ at the beginning and thereafter. Some show of reverence and selflessness by entering the monastery, but then falter. Others, however, seem slight at first, but, increasingly appropriating monastic life, eventually becoming less severe and zealous. St. Isaac the Syrian said often that the man is unworthy, constantly wounded or put down, by lack of experience of monastic life in a continual weakening of the soul, and suddenly, he almost blinds the banner of the army of giants son, and that his name be exalted and glorified much more than the ascetics known for their victories, and he receives a crown and precious gifts in abundance before all his friends. For this reason, no one is allowed despair. Let us not only to be negligent in prayer, and lazy to ask the Lord for His protection (Discourse 47). The greatest sinners often become great saints. The monastery is a place of repentance. It is impossible to refuse repentance to whoever wishes and research, (although, as one possessed, it can not be master of himself), since repentance is granted by God Himself. Therefore Harbour of repentance, the monastery has remained open. St. John Climacus, who lived in the seventh century, listing the reasons that encouraged novices to enter the monastery, said much the desire to avoid sin and temptation away his weakness, that of attaining Christian perfection , desire for which few were guided. Today, as the temptations and falls are increasing in the world and human forces are exhausted from them, most of those who, forced by their conscience, come to the monastery to come to remove the burden of sin to be helped in their weakness, self-control. Saint John Climacus described the monastery hospital already. This designation is more appropriate now. Can we refuse aid to a suffering humanity morally? We are concerned with the greatest zeal to organize asylums for the helpless and disabled. Why not create shelters for the sick, the helpless, the disabled of the soul?

Those who judge the monasteries of their erroneous point of view would prevail in these hospitals see a thriving health freed the slightest trace of disease: they had better find them effective therapies. This requirement then would be more appropriate. I happened to see this done. In the Diocese of Kaluga, near the town of Kozelsk lies the desert community of Optino. This is where settled in 1829 Hieromonk Leonid, known for his ascetic life experience. Subsequently, he was joined by his friend Macaire hieromonk the great coat. The two former were fed the reading of the Fathers on the monastic life. Guided by these writings, they guided those who sought a direction from them. These elders had inherited lifestyle of their masters, lifestyle that began in the time of the first monks, and then continued up to modern times by spiritual succession from generation to generation like a legacy, like the treasure worthy of their monks name and function. Optino the community immediately began to grow in large proportions and to develop spiritually. Exposed to the old ways just zealous brothers and convenient to undertake the spiritual feat. They support and encourage hesitant. They strengthen the weak. They brought to repentance and healing those who fell into sin and bad habits. A multitude of people of all classes of society flocked to the humble dwelling of the old ones to discover them before the suffering of their souls, and get treatment, consolation, consolidation, or healing. Thousands of people owe them for giving their lives a godly direction and peace of heart. These old watched the suffering humanity with compassion, they lightened the burden of sins, explaining the importance of the Redeemer, and the absolute necessity for Christians to abandon the sinful life. Indulgent for human weakness, yet they treated her with great force. That is the spirit of the Orthodox Church! That is how the saints of all time! Originally a fourth-century monk confessed his permanent falls in Saint Siso the Great. The saint encouraged and advised him to forward each fall through repentance and remain in asceticism. This advice was well founded? The all-new theorists "would not they recommend another way? ...

Optino in 1828 I visited the first time in 1856 and the last time. At that time, his condition was most flourishing. The community numbered some two hundred men. It commemorated the Father Leonid among the blessed. Father Macarius, who was seventy years, looked after the spiritual direction of the community and education of visitors. Yet despite the success of the monastery and the spiritual importance of community, very few monks were demonstrating the ability to be doctors and guides, something that requires both an innate ability and a spirit strengthened by a genuine feat monastic . These are the characteristics of hospitals: have few doctors and many patients. Today, the number of physicians continues to decline, and the patient increase. The cause is always the same: the world. Look at who he sends in the monasteries that these Christians are no longer elected beginnings of Christianity and monasticism, they are more members from the educated strata of the population. Today, monasteries are filled almost exclusively members of the lower classes of society, and moreover, increasingly unable to serve in the world, who dismisses them precisely for this reason. Most of these people enter the monastery with the habits and vices to their own social class, and especially with this vice that Prince Vladimir equal to the Apostles had to be "used" the people. Contaminated with this weakness, these poor people enter the monastery with the refrain, to do violence. But the habit takes over. Many people are very pious, endowed with admirable qualities, are subject to this weakness. They weep bitterly their falls and try to delete them through repentance. But the tears shed at the bottom of the cells and repentance hidden in hearts can not be seen of men, as are the falls. These falls shocked members of the layers educated society, babies are usually particularly outraged by the monasteries. Yet these people also have weaknesses, they also easily excuse and forgive easily if the monks were at home. But they visit the monasteries with their habits and their views, they stare down the weakness of the common people are scandalized and without thinking they have just dealing with ordinary people. They see the monks as being totally separate from the laity. They want to find among them models of perfection, and think only lay on the other hand, anything goes. But ordinary people are otherwise weaknesses of their fellow ...

In a remote monastery lived in an old turn of the century who looked to instruct his fellow man. When he died, he left teaching for those with the passion of the drink. The former came from a modest background. With great compassion for his suffering brethren, he says it is impossible for one who has lost all power over himself to heal, and even to refrain from his passion, staying in the midst of temptations. For this reason, it offers patients come to his monastery, which lies just away from temptations. This advice is good and wise. Deserts far from home can be truly secular shelters, real hospitals for those suffering from the ills of the soul. They can also preserve the scandal the needy people in mind.

- It follows from what you said that currently, many monasteries do not correspond to their destination. Measures necessary amendment.

- Yes. In our age of secular education is growing rapidly, and is separated from civilian life the life of the Church. A multitude of lessons hostile to the Church from the West stormed home. Morality is weakening across all strata of society. A reordering of the monasteries is therefore, for two reasons. First to save monasticism itself, which is useful and even indispensable to the Church. Then, to preserve the people of scandals. Shocked more or less precisely, the people increasingly weakened in their faith. To carry all this out, it will take more than a superficial understanding of monasticism, it will require a detailed knowledge based on experience of the Holy Church and the Holy Fathers, and with it an awareness of the validity and sanctity of the experience. The reform measures of monasticism from the treasury of carnal reasoning smelly him have always been extremely harmful. In taking such measures, trample underfoot the provisions most holy, inspired and sent by the Holy Spirit, the world could be proud and darkened in his lack of discernment and reflection, finally losing monasticism, and with it all of Christianity.

- Could you cite, for example, a measure taken by one of Fathers who could give an idea of the reforms needed by the monasteries.

- I suggest you pay attention to the Rule of St. Nil of Sora, our compatriot of the fifteenth century, which was perhaps the last of the holy writers to speak of the monastic life. This rule is brief, but very full. Profound and spiritual, it was a thousand copies published in 1852 by the Holy Synod and sent to monasteries. Nilus took the monastic habit in order to study and accomplish the feat itself in monastic tradition of the elders Fathers. To better understand this tradition, he undertook a journey to the East, spent significant time at Mount Athos, conversed with the disciples of Saint Gregory of Sinai and St. Gregory Palamas, and came into contact with the monks of the region from Constantinople. Back in Russia, he settled in a thick forest of the Sora river area, in our homeland and became the founder of the hermitage life. The rule which I mentioned was written for his hermitage.

The work of Saint Nil is especially valuable for us since it is easier to adapt to monasticism Contemporary. The latter, due to the scarcity of teachers pneumatophores can no longer operate with the absolute obedience of former monks. Nilus proposes to replace the absolute obedience to the master pneumatophore by studying the Scriptures and the Holy Fathers, together with advice taken from brothers who have succeeded in this way, not without checking this advice in the Scriptures. After studying the remarkable feat monastic, Saint Nile hear his humble voice to oppose the Russian monasticism of his day, which for simplicity and ignorance, was diverted from its true vocation. But we paid no attention to that voice: the passion had become general, it had acquired invincible strength. It ended in the eighteenth century by the shaking of the monasteries. This passion was to want to buy goods in large quantities.

- What can we learn from the useful to the work of contemporary monasticism Saint Nile?

- Above all, the epitome of Saint Nil is extraordinarily useful. Having studied the Scriptures and the writings of the Fathers of monasticism, he did not limited this study to a single reading, but was enriched by his own experiences. Not only that, he still wanted to see the lives of holy monks of Mount Athos and Byzantine, to supplement its knowledge and its business model in their lives. Having reached the spiritual success, he denied having been reached, and not trying to teach his neighbor. Yet he was asked not to deny a word of instruction. After repeated requests of the brothers, he obeyed their request and accepted it as an obedience title of master and superior. In all this we see that for the establishment, support, or amendment a monastery, he must place his head worthy men, who have studied the Scriptures and the writings of the Fathers, and who have acquired additional knowledge and active living to be drawn upon themselves the divine grace. We must pray to God that He sends such people who, with their experience, can only enforce the holy monastic rules as it should. Saint John Cassian says that in the monasteries of Egypt, who were the first in the world, the position of supervisor was assigned only to monks who lived in obedience and knew from experience the tradition of the Fathers.

The most important rule of Saint Nil is the prominent place that comes to the Scriptures and the writings of the Fathers in spiritual direction. St. John Climacus defines as the monk who seeks only to the orders and words of God, anytime, anywhere and anything. Nilus followed this rule, and he sent his disciples: "We decided if this is the will of God, to accept those who come to us to respect the tradition of the Holy Fathers and keep commandments of God, but not they introduce justifications and excuses for their sins by saying that now it is impossible to live according to Holy Scripture, or by following the writings of the Fathers. No! Even if we are weak, we must, according to our strengths, imitate the blessed Fathers eternal memory and follow them, even if we could achieve the same level by themselves. " Whoever knows the serious situation of Russian monasticism can testify that only monasteries that are blessed with holy readings mentioned above are successful on the moral and spiritual, and only the monks who were fed by these holy readings are sacrificing the monk. Nilus never gave instruction or answer himself, but offered to those who questioned or the teaching of Scripture or the Fathers. When he could not find an answer in his memory hallowed in any trouble, he left the question unanswered until he found the answer in Scripture. It demonstrates that in one of these letters. This procedure may be seen clearly in St. Peter Damascene, St. Gregory of Sinai, the Holy Fathers and other Xanthopouloi later, as hieromonks Leonid and Macarius of Optino. Their memory was richly adorned with the thoughts of the saints. They never gave their own advice. They always exposed the sentences of Scripture or the Fathers. This gave them great strength. Those who would willingly responded to human words listened with reverence the word of God and were just submit their own reasoning. Such behavior keeps in great humility that gives the board, as shown very clearly the rule of St. Nilus: "Whoever transmits transmits not what is his, but what is God's. He becomes a witness, a member of Holy Truth, and his conscience is still Question: Is what I am doing my service responsibly and reverently towards God? The Divine Scriptures and the words of the Holy Fathers are countless as the grains of sand from the sea exploring them without laziness, we disclose it to those who come to us and need education. More exactly, they are not unworthy as we are communicating, but the blessed Fathers, the Scriptures. " All holy ascetic authors argue that with the general teacher shortage pneumatophores close study of Scripture (preferably the New Testament) and patristic writings will be the only way to spiritual success granted by God to monasticism late. Nilus refused to cohabit with those brothers who did not want to live by this rule, it is so important and essential.

The second moral rule expounded by Saint Nil is that the brothers confess their sins daily to the old who are entrusted with the direction of the community, even the most trivial, and their thoughts, perceptions sinful, and their difficulties. This practice carries a great spiritual benefit. No ascetic can not put passions to death so easily. Passions still away from that without the confession thank you. Carnal lust fades by confession, more than in the fasting or the day before. The monks who take early the habit of daily confession still trying to adulthood to use as often as possible to this treatment because they know from experience what freedom it brings to the soul. For this feat, they study in detail about themselves the fall of humanity. Caregiver is the confession of their sins, they acquire knowledge and art of helping the next in disorders of his soul. The hieromonks Desert Optino had many disciples in their direction they opened their daily consciousness after the rule of evening prayers. These scholars differed markedly from those who lived arbitrarily. The thought of confession that would take place was like a permanent custody of their conduct, she gradually accustomed to look after themselves. The confession made them concentrate on themselves and constantly absorbed in the Holy Scriptures.

confession daily, regular examination of conscience is a very old monastic practice. It was widespread throughout the primitive monasticism, as is clear from the works of St. John Cassian, John Climacus, Barsanuphius the Great, Abbot Isaiah, Dorothy Abbot, and all the patristic writings on monasticism. In all likelihood, this practice was instituted by the Apostles themselves (Jac.5, 16).

monks educated in the two rules presented here can be compared to people who enjoy a good view and life, but the monks are deprived of education comparable to that of the blind or dead. These two rules, introduced in any monastery, can significantly improve the moral and spiritual community, as evidenced by the experience, even if nothing is changed in the monastery. To effectively implement the second rule, it must of course have a monk who was successful in spiritual life, and who was himself educated under this rule. The experience is absolutely essential in this regard. Saint John Cassian wrote: "It is useful to reveal his thoughts to the fathers, but not just any, only to former spiritual, endowed with the discernment of those who can truly be called old , not only for their age and their gray hairs. Many people, attracted by the sight of venerable old age, have revealed their thoughts and found a nuisance instead of treatment expected, due to the inexperience of those who had listened to. "

- You have to expose the basic principles of good organization of a monastery. Do not refuse to include also other rules of the Holy Fathers, who could help find monasteries their natural state.

- The education of man depends very much on external impressions. It can not be otherwise, we are created as well. The Fathers who have pierced this mystery, have in their holy tradition surrounding the monk impressions purposely chosen to lead it toward the goal and tried to drive all the impressions that could dissuade him from that goal. To explain this, let us turn again to the precious book of St. Nilus of Sora. Recommends that the holy church of the monastery is constructed very simply. They refer to it in St. Pachomius the Great, who wanted to see the church in his community no architectural finesse, so that the spirit of the monks, attracted by human praise, do not slide to the many and various tricks of the Devil. At this Holy Nile adds: "If the holy spoke and acted well, how much more should we be cautious, we who are weak and passionate, we dont mind stumbles so easily! "Saint Nilus also recommends that the cells and other monastic buildings are very simple, devoid of expensive ornaments. The Greater Saint John the Prophet, who lived as a recluse in Gaza before his death gave instructions to the new Abbot of community. He advised him to organize the cells without giving them amenities unnecessary because the buildings in this world have no more value than simple tents in the light of eternity. Nilus, based on the conduct of the ancient Fathers, also recommends that the vestments and religious objects are simple, as little as possible precious and few. Similarly, he ordered that all monastic property are simple, without excess, only to satisfy the needs. We must avoid creating any vanity or attachment with the monks, whose spiritual forces must be stretched to exclusively God. St. Nilus Skete prohibits the entry of the females. Formerly, men in monasteries, and Mount Athos to this day, women were not allowed to enter. This is absolutely necessary for those who want to conquer nature! It is essential to completely remove such temptations. They can not not engage in that indecision before them. The usefulness of this measure is even clearer today when morality is in obvious decline. In Russia, it is highly necessary to remove the wine from the monasteries. The piles higher monasteries have always understood this, and in particular the right Theophanes, superior of the monastery and renovator Cyrillo-Novoezersky and recently deceased, who has been in vain all his zeal to destroy the use of wine in the monastery in its care. But the efforts are short-lived as the provisions of the monasteries on the Holy Fathers are not restored in their fullness.

St. Nil comments so monastic life in his birthplace, that is to say in the East. Back in Russia, he settled into a deep desert. The place chosen to fill it. He explains why in one of his letters "By the grace of God I found the place that suits my mind because it is inaccessible to the laity . If a man so holy, it was nice to live in a place where he could not easily be visited by the secular, then a fortiori for us who are weak of will, unreasonable, and easily prone to sin, as it is necessary that we live far from secular! May we not see rushing crowds of lay people and with them crowds of temptations! Nilus wished his monks live by the work of their hands, and receive alms of the laity in very small quantities, and only when necessary. These are the basic rules dictated by the Fathers of monasticism, and recognized by the Holy Church. Other rules concerning the details of everyday life, have the same character and the same goal.

- Many monasteries were more or less hijacked the rules you have listed. These deviations should be corrected one day or another. The instruction and minds of people today are growing, you know, that these corrections are not deferred longer. It's in society. It would be good in the midst of voices that speak without knowing, we also hear the voices of those who speak knowingly. Who is it who you think might help them regain their monasteries right destination?

- I've almost answered that question, however, the answer is very complex. I think the words of the Savior on the field in which good seed was sown, but where, amid the good seed, were also discovered from the chaff in large quantities. These are not men but angels who proposed the Master to tear. But he refused for fear that pulling the weeds, wheat is also torn ... Is not this the best way to do with the monasteries? In any case, it is necessary to consider all this carefully. When we correct the buildings that have outlived their usefulness, we must be careful. The doctors refuse to receive reasonable diseases too rooted in the body, for fear of destroying life itself. Monasteries and monasticism have been instituted by the Holy Spirit through these vessels that were the election of the Holy Fathers. Restoring their monasteries in ancient spiritual beauty, if this is in God's plans will only be possible with the grace of God and instruments worthy of the job. That's all I can say on the general topic. Anyway it is clear that improving monasteries in no way be the work of secular. The laity act with piety if they call this work in the hands of those who divine providence itself forward it, and that accounts will be requested at the Last Judgement. I consider it a sacred duty to give you the advice I got from old experienced and worthy of respect. They say this to lay and monks who sincerely seek salvation: in this era when scandals are so numerous, must be particularly attentive to yourself, pay no attention to life and affairs of others and not judge those who are outraged. The action passes easily corruptible the scandal of those whom the scandal draws to those who judge them. These old men advise the laity to move through life with the Gospel and those of fathers who have left instructions for Christians in general, as Saint Tikhon of Zadonsk. For the monks, they advise to head with the Gospel and the Fathers who wrote especially for the monks. The monk who runs the light of patristic writings may find salvation in any monastery. However, lose his salvation he who lives by following his own will and reason, even though he would live in deep desert . Woe unto the world because of scandals! (Mt.18, 7 ) Because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold (Mt.24, 12). The arrival of the scandals is expected by God (Mt.18, 7). After redemption, the possibility was left to man to choose between good and evil, as she had was left after its creation. But the man chosen most often wrong, as he did after its creation. In the midst of Paradise, evil burst under the mask of the property, to seduce the man more easily. Today it appears in the Holy Church, masked and dressed in the infinite variety of temptations and attractive, under the guise of innocent entertainment and festivities, development (of the carnal life) and success of humanity, which are actually humiliate the Holy Spirit. The men are corrupted in mind because of their benevolence to injustice. They are reprobate concerning the faith, they have every form of godliness, but deny that they actually force (2Tim.3, 8.5). For those who have received this force and subsequently voluntarily dismissed, a reversal is difficult (Heb.10, 26): the willingness inevitably leaves one who disdains the gift of God intentionally. A form of godliness may be more or less glued by human tricks, but the restoration of the power of piety belongs to Him who is the men of the Power of top (Luc24, 49). The tree is often grown old and feeble trimmed a thick veil of green leaves and seems healthy with its large trunk, but inside it is already rotten, the first storm will break ...

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Tailbone Injury Three Months To Heal

DIALOGUE BETWEEN ONE AND MONK A LAY OF ST

Dialogue between Orthodox monk and a layman, about monasticism. (From St. Ignatius Brianchaninov)

- Lay : My father, I consider myself fortunate to have found you as a person I can open my heart to hear a sincere word. I wish with all my soul be a member of the Orthodox Church and follow its tradition, both dogmatic and moral terms. To this end, I seek to understand correctly all traditional subjects. A misunderstanding leads to unjust acts, which are themselves the cause of personal and social nuisance. Do not refuse now to explain the importance of monasticism in the Church of Christ!

- The monk : May God bless your desire! All that is good indeed born of a fair and accurate understanding. A misunderstanding or false attracts misfortune. It besides that preaches the Gospel, which offers the Truth as a primary cause of salvation, and lies as the primary cause of perdition (Jn.8, 32.44). But why do you that our conversation today is precisely on monasticism?

- In the middle I frequent, it is often a question of monasticism. Today, different opinions are issued in this regard. My friends ask me almost always on my point of view, because they know that I frequent clerics. I wish I could answer them accurately, so I am speaking to you.

- I do not know how I can help you, nevertheless I will speak with sincerity, trying to expose what I know through my readings of Scripture and Fathers, in my conversations with monks whose lives are worthy of respect and trust, and my own experience. As the basis of this interview, as the cornerstone of the building, I would say that the introduction of monasticism is that of God , and never men.

- Imagine that I have ever heard in society that monasticism has been established by God!

- I know. That is why in conversations about worldly monasticism one says "I think ... "And another replies" me and it seems to me rather than ... "And another" me, I would do so ... ". Thousand conflicting opinions from persons who have no idea what monasticism, but would nevertheless be ready to compose monastic rules as their own wisdom. There are even some people to peddle the blasphemies of atheists on the subject. The heart is overwhelmed by sadness and fear when ignorance crowd with his big hooves the most precious pearls of a tradition established by God.

- Correct! Ignorance, as you say, father, is the reason for all this!

- Do not think that ignorance is an evil insignificant! The Holy Fathers say it is the root of all evil. St. Mark the Ascetic says she is the main source of wickedness. Another father said that the ignorant and unaware of his ignorance is satisfied with his knowledge. Ignorance is able to do much harm without knowing it. I say this out of compassion for all those people who do not know what the dignity of man, and for all those Christians who do not know what is Christianity and hurt themselves through ignorance. Do not think however that I intend to combine abuse and human weakness with divine teachings! Indicate abuse and dissociate divine institutions is a sign of reverence towards the past and a way to keep them in holiness required and granted by God.

- Your last sentence is also a novelty for me. I had never seen this angle monasticism, and had not met either and in the ideas of others.

- What I said is not just about monasticism, but also the whole Church of the New Testament as the Old. The Lord has shown Himself in the parable of the vine (Mt.21) that the Church of the Old Testament was founded by God and sent by Him to the Jewish people. In addition, according to the Gospel and Holy Scripture (0.22 to 29 Eph.1 & 2:10-11) that the New Testament Church was founded by the God-Man and transmitted to other people formed in fact all people: the people of the Christians. Formerly, Jews were to make accountable to God for the gift that had been made, management of this gift; has proven criminal conduct, they were dismissed and punished as soon as they swerved in mind. Similarly, accounts will be requested to Christians on how they use the general divine institution is the Church of the New Testament, and specific institutions such as monasticism.

- Is there any possibility to find in the Scriptures is what on earth the ultimate fate of the New Testament Church?

- The Scriptures testify to the fact that Christians, like Jews, will cool gradually towards teaching revealed by God. They begin to not pay attention to the regeneration of human nature made by the God-Man, forget it forever, and direct all their attention on terrestrial life. They take charge of their situation down here as if it were eternal. They heal the development of their fallen nature and will satisfy all the desires and requirements of their souls and their bodies depraved. Of course the Redeemer who came to redeem man to eternal bliss, is alien to such a trend away from Christianity. The removal may take place according to the Scriptures (1Thes.2, 3). Monasticism also participate in the weakening of Christianity, as a member of the body can not but feel the weakness that affects the entire body. The Holy Spirit revealed this to moreover holy monks of ancient times, when Christianity will be limited to a handful, then life on this earth will cease.

- What is the importance of monasticism in the Church of Christ?

- The monks are Christians who give up as much as possible, all land occupation, to devote himself to prayer, the queen of virtues. Through prayer, they seek to unite with God to be one with Him, in the words of the Apostle: one that attaches to the Lord is one spirit with Him (1Cor.6 17). As the prayer draws its strength from the other virtues and Christ's teaching, the monks are showing particular zeal to fulfill the commandments of the Gospel. Adding to the fulfillment of the commandments, which is mandatory for all Christians, the practice of two councils, that of poverty and celibacy, they strive to live a life similar to the earthly life of God-Man: for this reason that qualifies holy monks very lifelike.

- Where do the monks do they name them?

- Words monk, monastery and monasticism comes from the Greek word monos , which means a . The monk is a person who lives alone, or in solitude. The monastery is a home lonely, isolated. Monasticism, that's life alone. This life is different from ordinary life, common, therefore the Russian language uses the word for it inotchestvo , who just Inoi , other. The monk is also called Inoki. Words community life, skite , hesychia , hermit, imprisonment, life in the desert correspond to various forms of monastic life. Community life means living together in a more or less important to monks who share the divine services, meals, the same type of clothing, and depend the same level. The hermitage means the coexistence of two or three monks in a particular cell, living on advice from each other or asking advice from older, share meals and clothing, are five days per week in their offices cell, and come Saturday and Sunday at the Community Office at the church. The hermit is a monk who lives in solitude. The reclusive hermit is one who stays in his cell at the monastery without leave. The hermit is a hermit who lives in a depopulated desert.

- monasticism When did it start?

- From St. John Cassian, from the time of the Apostles. Saint John Cassian (monk, Father of the Church of the fourth century e) visited the monasteries of Egypt at the time of their full potential. Having lived long enough among the monks of the desert Scete, he transmitted to posterity in writing the rules and teachings of the monks. He said that in Egypt, they were the followers of the Holy Apostle and Evangelist Mark, the first Bishop of Alexandria, who first received the name of monks. These monks lived in isolated places, close to the metropolis Egypt, to lead a life of higher according to the rules provided by the Evangelist. The lifetime of the holy martyr Eugenia, under the Emperor Commodus (ind. 180), and Philippe dignitary, governor of Egypt, there was a monastery on the outskirts of Alexandria in which the Bishop of the time The holy hierarch Elijah took the coat from his youth. The Jewish historian Philo, a contemporary of the Apostles and a citizen of Alexandria, describes the life of the "therapists" who had moved away from the city to lead in a mansion called monasteries life similar to that of monks described by St. John Cassian. But the description of Philo does not say that these therapists were Christians, because secular knowledge was very superficial at this time, there were many who did not differentiate between Christians and Jews, and took the first as a sect of the latter. In the life of Saint Anthony the Great, written by his contemporary Saint Athanasius the Great, Archbishop of Alexandria, it is said that when, at the age of twenty years, St. Anthony became a monk, monks led the Egyptian solitary life near cities or villages. St. Anthony died in 356, at the age of one hundred five years. Monasticism is also attested in Syria in the time of the Apostles. Eudocia the holy martyr, who lived in Heliopolis in Syria during the reign of Trajan (98-113) was converted to Christianity by Saint Germain, superior of a monastery of men seventy monks after his conversion, she entered a thirty convent nuns. In the last years of the third century, St. Anthony the Great introduced life to the desert. At the end of the fourth century, St. Pachomius the Great founded Tabennêsis community life in the desert of Thebes, and Saint Macarius Grand hesychast life in the wilderness of Scete near Alexandria. This place is the origin of the word hermitage, and monasteries organized for this kind of life, also called sketes. St. Basil the Great, Archbishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia, who lived in the second half of the fourth century, studied the monastic life in Egypt before returning to his homeland to live as a monk until his debut in the service of the Church. He wrote the rules that were used as models throughout the Eastern Church. And monasticism, hiding first in the vicinity of towns and villages, moved to the fourth century to the uninhabited deserts. However, the monasteries still existed in the cities. Saint John Cassian suggests that those who would like more details on the subject to delve into the history books of the Church. Unfortunately, these books do not succeed until we, as do almost all the documents drafted in Egypt because they were destroyed by Muslims in the seventh century e . It was the same in other Christian countries submitted by the Muslims, but to a lesser degree.

- What is the reason for this emigration monasticism to places far from towns and villages?

- This emigration took place when stopped the exploits of the martyrs. At this time, as Christianity spread and was protected by the state, all men adhered to the Christian faith, not just those elected determined to withstand very great misfortune and even death. Christianity did not keep the denial of previous centuries. In towns and villages, Christians began to worry about anything that concerns the life of this world, luxury, enjoyment carnal, the popular festivities, and all activities which the first confessors of the faith were foreigners, seeing the denial of Christ in spirit. The desert thus became a natural refuge, a shelter against the temptations for those who wish to retain full power to Christianity. "The desert," says St. Isaac the Syrian, is useful as the weak to the strong. It allows first, for the removal of material, not to see their passions ignite and multiply, and the latter to engage in combat against evil spirits. " St. Basil the Great and St. Dimitri of Rostov and describe the reasons for flight in the desert of San Gordius " Gordius fled the city noise, the shouts of the market, the praise of princes, the judgments of those that show, sell, buy, swear, lie, say shameful things. He fled the games, laughter and jeers of the city to keep its eyes and ears clean, and especially his heart purified and able to see God. It was worthy of divine revelations, and learned a very great mysteries, not men, but his Lord in truth, the Spirit. " From their transfer to the desert, the monks adopted a particular dress to distinguish definitively lay. At the time of persecution on the contrary, the clergy and the monks were the most common clothing to avoid attracting the attention of the persecutors.

- Teaching high which was deemed worthy Saint Gordius was the preserve of a small minority. But now, the Christian faith is taught in detail and satisfactory in seminaries and theological academies.

- Between teaching theological institutions and the monasteries, there is a huge difference, even if the topic is the same: Christianity. The Saviour of world, sending the Holy Apostles to preach throughout the world, commanded them to spread among the nations faith in the true God, and teach life according to the commandments: "Go and make disciples of all nations , baptizing them in the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you "(Mt.28 0.19 to 20). The teaching of faith must precede baptism and the teaching of life according to the commandments must be followed. The first lesson is theoretical, the second practice. First, the Holy Apostle Paul said: "I have nothing hidden that is helpful, I am not afraid to preach and to teach you, publicly and in homes, announcing to the Jews and Greeks repentance before God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ "(Act.20 0.20 to 21). The second, he said: "Christ in us the hope of glory, unto Him we preach, warning and teaching every man in all wisdom, to present every man perfect in Christ Jesus" (Col.1 0.27 to 28). God provided two lessons about himself: instruction in speech, received by faith, and teaching about life, received by an activity complies with the commandments of the Gospel. We can compare the first teaching foundations of the building, and the second to the building itself. It is impossible to build without foundations, and foundation without a building are of no use. "Faith without works is dead" (Jac.2, 26). The Holy Apostle Paul insists on the absolute necessity of the first lesson: "faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ. How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe one they have not heard? And how can they hear if no one preaches? (Rom.10, 17.14) Here the beginning of catechesis. To those who engaged in Christianity, the Apostles and their successors exposed basic education (God, the God-man, man and its importance in time and eternity, the sacraments, the bliss of Paradise, the suffering of hell (Hb.6 0.1 to 2), and the rest), which is the dogmatic Christianity, plus the theoretical life according to the commandments of the Gospel (Hb . XI, XII, and XIII), the foundation of moral dogmatic theology, the science of the highest. Since apostolic times began to appear around the Church of Christ judgments heretics, that is to say, judgments about the revelation from human intelligence distorted. In teaching revealed by God, there is no place for human reasoning: from Alpha to Omega, everything is from God. The Holy Church has endeavored to keep carefully priceless spiritual treasure entrusted to it: the Education of God revealed. She denoted her overt enemies, the pagans and philosophers, and Jews, repelling their attacks. She has denoted its internal enemies, heretics, denying them education, rejecting her breast, bringing her children guard against them. It is for this reason that theology has spread increasingly with time. He soon had schools to teach it. The oldest and the largest was that of Alexandria, which flourished especially in the second and third centuries. The doctrines hostile to the divine teaching is constantly multiplying, the need to hold theological establishment became increasingly apparent. The West deviated from the East and fell into heresy, absorbing the instructions and pagan customs. Therefore, the doctrines hostile to the Orthodox Church, monstrous and blasphemous doctrines built with malignancy and boldness, multiplied to infinity. Theological institutions became a vital necessity for the Orthodox Church, like the breath of life. Judge for yourselves! It should clearly demonstrate to the Orthodox Christian, and especially one who is about to become a pastor, as the true teaching of the Orthodox Church, that his fight victory over his enemies covert and overt, hidden and discovered, battle s' ignites more for eighteen centuries. Must satisfactorily explain the errors of Arius, of Macedonius, Nestorius, Eutyches and iconoclastic, crowned by atheism and the latest inventions of philosophy. The study of theology demanded some time in the early years of Christianity, it requires more today. Previously, it could be transmitted during sermons in church today, it requires many years of study. That is the purpose of our seminaries and academies: transmit basic knowledge of Christianity, as a sort of introduction (St. Mark the Ascetic says) our youth still inactive in the company, which derive a theoretical preparation only, and ignore the output of the seminar knowledge from experience. On this theoretical knowledge of faith, we must build a knowledge active, lively, animated by grace. Is to acquire this knowledge that life on earth is given to man. The Christian who lives among the world according to the commandments of the gospel inevitably enriched with this knowledge, not only by his own experience but also by the work of grace. But enriched many more who will deposit all the cares of this world to use all his time, all the forces of his body and his soul to please God, that is to say the least. It was he who in the Gospel, possess the commandments of the Lord, who will represent his whole legacy. "He who has My commandments and keeps them is he who loves Me. And he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, I love and I will manifest myself to him "(Jn.14, 21) With this in mind that the most zealous Christians of all ages, having completed their education in institutions School, came up today and come in monasticism to receive instruction. Who were the great masters of the Church of all time? Monks. Who explained in detail the teaching of the Church, which has maintained its tradition for posterity, which denounced the heresies and crushed? Monks. Who scored the blood of his confession of orthodox faith? Monks. It is quite natural. Christians living in the midst of this world, entangled in ties, concerned about various concerns voluntary or involuntary, can not spend all their time and their love for God. "He who is unmarried is concerned about the things of the Lord, how he may please the Lord, and he who is married is concerned about worldly things" (1Cor.7 0.32 to 33). Whoever married can not attach permanently to the Lord in prayer detached from the land, and united with the Lord in one spirit (1Cor.6, 17) as possible to the monk. Nevertheless, for a successful Christian personal , erudition necessary to masters of the Church is not necessary: many illiterates, like St. Anthony the Great, took the habit monastic achieved Christian perfection, the spiritual light spilled over their contemporaries by their teachings and the gifts of grace. "Who says St. John Climacus, among the laity, has never performed miracles? Who has risen from the dead? Who cast out demons? Nobody! All these things are the price that won the monks and the world can achieve. "

- All the monks are unable to state as high, reaching their goal; few people actually achieve that ...

- There is no doubt that, as God has promised, the monks who spend their whole lives to follow the monastic rules acquire the grace of God. It is impossible that the word of God does not fulfilled. The commandments of the Gospel come with a promise: they communicate the Spirit of God to those who perform them. Conversely, the monks who disdain the rules set by God to monasticism, and conduct their lives in distraction, arbitrary, or pleasure, that is to say, who love the world will be deprived of success. It's the same for all Christians: those who lead a Christian life are the hello, but those who live like pagans are lost. There were once many more saints among the monks and many more saved among Christians. But our time is experiencing a general decline in faith and morals. However, there are still monks and authentic Christians. I repeat that if monks are unworthy of their status and their vocation is that they are misusing the divine institution. Yet this divine institution does not cease to be divine, even if the men violate. Similarly, Christianity retains its great dignity, in spite of life contrary to the teaching Christ carried by many Christians. We must therefore judge of Christianity and monasticism in the Christian monks or authentic. But this is not so easy: piety and virtue, as chaste virgins, are still hiding in the depths of unknown cells, as in the mantle, as opposed to adulterous women who strive to appear in public half naked. Often the high life of a monk is discovered during or after his death. The monk who participates in the grace of God is often the object of hatred in the world of gossip and slander, because the world hates the Spirit of God (Jn.15 0.18 to 19). Success itself has various degrees, because, as has been said above, the monastic solitude is useful for high and low for different reasons. Of course, the latter are always more numerous than the former.

- After everything you just said, it should show that monasticism is a divine institution.

- The Savior of the world has identified two ways, that is to say, two kinds of life for those who believe in Him: the path that brings salvation, and the path that leads to perfection . The Gospel says of those who take the second route they follow Christ, because this pathway is the most accurate expression of the Lord's teaching, and the imitation of the kind of life he led himself during his earthly pilgrimage.

to get the hello, you need three things: faith in Christ (Jn.3, 36 & 17.3), the life according to God's commandments (Mt.19, 17 & ; Mc.10, 19), and healing through repentance of our shortcomings in performing the commandments (Luc13, 35). The hello is inclusive and accessible to everyone, regardless of its obligations in the world, provided that they are not inconsistent with the law of God.

Some, like the apostles, are called to follow the Lord by the Lord Himself, but in general, the Lord allowed everyone the freedom to follow the . This occurs several times in the Gospel. If anyone would come after Me ... (Mt.16, 24) If you would be perfect ... (Mt.19, 21) If anyone comes to Me ... (Luc26, 14), such are the phrases that the Lord uses to speak of him who would follow Him to perfection Christian. If so take on this kind of life is left to individual freedom, the conditions are set by the Lord. We must accept these conditions in order to follow the . And what are these conditions? If anyone would come after Me, let him deny himself, let him take up his cross and follow me, If thou wilt be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow Me, If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father, mother, wife, children, brothers and his sisters, and even his own life, he does can be My disciple. And whosoever doth not bear his cross and follow me can not be My disciple. Whoever of you does not renounce all that he has can not be My disciple. Here are the key promises of the monk.

As we have said, monasticism in its early days was nothing but a solitary life, away from noise, led by Christians who sought to perfection. So these Christians of Alexandria who were on the outskirts of the city's recommendations Evangelist St. Mark. The Holy Apostle Paul says to all Christians who wish to enter into closer communion with the Lord "we are the temple of the living God, and God said: dwell among them and I will walk ; I will be their God and they will be My people. Come out from among these people and stay away, says the Lord. Do not touch anything unclean, and I, I will receive you. I am a father to you, and you shall be my son and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty (2Cor.6 0.16 to 18) Saint John Climacus then assigns this role to the monks (2.15) and the early church understood these words of the Lord the same way. Saint Athanasius the Great Saint Anthony reported on the following thing: a teenager, St. Anthony went into a church to pray. That day, we read the pericope of the Gospel of St. Matthew on the rich man who questioned the Lord about salvation and perfection. On hearing these words ("If thou wilt be perfect, sell what you own ..."), Anthony, who was concerned about choosing a lifestyle, acknowledged the response of the Lord Himself. He immediately sold his property for distribution to the poor, and became a monk. These fundamental words of the Lord are still read today in the taking of monastic habit. Life in the desert was instituted in the wake of revelations. God called St. Anthony to live in the deep desert. An angel commanded Saint Macarius the Great to settle in the desert Scete. An angel also ordered St. Pachomius the Great established his monastic community in the desert, after which he handed him the written rules for monastic life. These three saints were men filled with the Holy Spirit and constantly united to God. They lent their mouths the word of God, as once Moses with the people of Israel to build the monks. In the following centuries, the Spirit Saint never stopped to illuminate monasticism. This teaching of the Holy Spirit, which is Christ's teaching and instruction from God to monasticism, that fathers call the science of sciences, was exposed with clarity and fullness by the monks in their holy writings inspired by God. All attest to the fact that the introduction of monasticism, this supernatural life, is not human: it is God's work.

- Some assume that the purpose of the first three centuries of monasticism was the fleeing persecution raised by the pagans.

- The carnal reasoning always deals falsely spiritual men. The monks of the early centuries were thirsty for martyrdom, and many were crowned, like Nikon, Julien Eudocia, Eugenie Févronie, and many others. Once he had the opportunity, the holy hermit Gordius, quoted above, went to Caesarea in Cappadocia to denounce paganism during a popular festival, confessing Christ, this confession and seal with martyrdom. When Emperor Diocletian unleashed his great and cruel persecution, St. Anthony the Great was already a monk and hermit. Having heard of the plight of Christians he left his cave in the desert to run in Alexandria confess Christ and join the martyrs. The holy martyr was well, but by love and desire: that he should desire to suffer for the Name of the Lord, martyrdom was not granted him. Lord had already begun to replace the abundant harvest of martyrs and holy by another harvest, no less abundant: that the monks had to perform in the field of another witness. The punishments were hardly ceased, the Christian blood had barely stopped flowing, as thousands of monks rushed to the wild desert to crucify the flesh with its passions and desires (Gal.5, 24), and confess Christ before Principalities, Powers, and Stewards of the world of darkness (Eph.6, 12). Certainly, Saint Paul of Thebes withdrew into the desert to avoid the persecution of Emperor Decius. Maybe others gained the desert for the same reasons. But these are only isolated cases that do not allow any conclusion on the whole primitive monasticism. The primary reason of monasticism is not human weakness, but the strength of Christ's teaching. St. John Colobos, who wrote the life Saint Païssios the Great, wrote in the preface: "The heavenly and eternal goods rise in those who covet an immense desire. They nourish the heart of an insatiable sweetness and divine, maintain the continual remembrance of the bliss of the afterlife, the reward of effort, the bright triumph of ascetics, incite contempt of all that is temporal and vain, grow and not to spare the life itself, but rather to offer it to Christ, in the words of the Gospel. Such men prefer death for Christ at all pleasures. But as persecution is lacking now it becomes difficult to get this death so ardently desired, so the ascetics try to assume otherwise. They establish for themselves a slow killing and no less violent. They support thousands of daily pain, fast, perform various feats, struggling against invisible demons, forcing them hard to resist the carnal nature intangible enemy. "

- You compare the achievement of monasticism that of martyrdom?

- This is one and the same feat in different forms. The martyrdom and monasticism are based on the same sentences of the Gospel. Neither one nor the other have been invented by men: they were given to humanity by the Lord Himself. One and one can not be completed with the help of almighty God, and the intervention of grace. You will be provided by reading the lives of Antoine le Grand, Theodore Studite of Mary of Egypt, John the Great Suffering, Nikon Sukhoi, and others, whose deeds and sufferings were above Nature. Saint Symeon the New Theologian says his master Saint Symeon the Pious monk at Studion, he assimilated to the martyrs by his bodily sufferings.

- Tell me, father, what is the importance of celibacy and non-possession in the monastic feat. It's hard to understand for those who live in the world, working for the good of society, distribute abundant alms, and do many good works, listed and approved by the Gospel, and without further explanation , see the monastic life as an idle and useless life.

- Activities Lay you mention doing the commandments of the Gospel on the material: they are essential to hello, but insufficient to achieve the perfection . There also does brakes amid concerns and obligations of the world. Instead, successful land offers the possibility of increasing the amount of good works: this is a very rich man can distribute much alms to the poor, and a powerful lord can better defend the oppressed. However, in such activities, we must beware of acting like the Pharisee in the Gospel (cf. Comment of Blessed Theophylact of Bulgaria Luc18) which certainly multiplied the good works, but wore a look unfair on them. His vision of himself and his family are false, his good works became displeasing to God. The Apostle says that those who perform good works must do as good stewards of the manifold grace of God (1Pi.4, 10). Thus, the rich for handouts of his property, considering that they have been entrusted by God, if a lord gives his blessings, he does not brag about his social position as if it belonged own, because it God who has given him. So they look down upon the next will no longer be needed. Then their conscience will start to question the meaning of their works, just as before that of Job. Do they give satisfaction to God? Would it not they great or small defects? Gradually, these issues will eventually raise the idea of a more perfect life ...

Recognize that the monastic life seems useless and idle just to those who assume their activity! The index of activity is just Christian humility. Conversely, pride and presumption are sure signs of activity unjust, as indicated by the Lord Himself. The view that you mention thus showing a wrong view of Christianity and disfigured. Christian perfection has been given by the Lord Himself to His disciples. It begins where the good works prescribed for the laity to their fullness. Study Christianity, learn what is perfection, and you will understand the importance of monasticism, and blasphemous absurdity of the charges made against monks, who are striving to fulfill the commandments the highest in the Gospel, inaccessible to the laity. Those who denigrate denigrate monasticism the Lord Himself, who established the Christian perfection.

- Okay, that's understood! But show me clearly the scope of non-possession and celibacy on the path of Christian perfection.

- This is extraordinary. I'll try to make you accessible. Whoever distributes its goods to the needy in obedience to Christ and follow Him fully , is poor to suffer deprivation, which bring humility in abundance ceasing to base his hopes on the world, he focuses on God. His heart leaves the earth to heaven (mt.6, 21). He begins to navigate the ocean of this life sustained by faith. His concerns are presented to the Lord who, by ordering his closest disciples to distribute their goods (Luc12, 33) and limit their concerns to the minimum necessary for the body, has promised that the necessary would be provided by the Heavenly Father to those seeking the Kingdom of Heaven and his righteousness (mt.6 0.24 to 33). Tribulations are then allowed for these servants of God's providence seems to be hiding, the world acquires a particular strength. All this is essential to teaching the faith alive in God is tested by that is fortified. The experiment spread to light disbelief, the removal or denial of God, states inherent in the fallen nature. When the heart weakens and ceases to be alert, he slips into a distressing blindness hopes in himself, taking on the world, about nature, and away from hope in God (Mt.14, 28 - 32). This brief explanation shows that deprivation of property pushed the ascetic of Christ to a higher spiritual state that isolates it from the brothers live in the world, state that they can not know by experience. However, this state is also high constant pain for the body and the fallen nature. That is what the Lord calls the cross .

On a spiritual level, non-possession is similar to celibacy. The effort to defeat the fallen nature led to a feat that can not imagine those who do not experience. This feat of denial of nature is completed by the cross of non-possession (which implies that the renunciation property). It leads to the abyss of humility, faith living in thanksgiving. In this asceticism, as reflected in the lives of saints, the spirits of darkness cooperate with the fallen nature of man to keep in the fall. According to the difficulties of battle, victory can be very fruitful (scale 4.47), and obtain the renewal of nature by visiting the heart of what the holy fathers call spiritual perception (Saint Macarius the Great 5.7): nature is still human, but his perception changes (St. Isaac the Syrian 43 & 48). Thus, the oil-soaked paper absorbs more water, not because its nature has changed, but because his thirst for absorption is nourished by material that has no physical relationship with water .

- Nowadays, many people who think that the celibate life is against nature, impossible, and that closing the door to nature leads her to search for illegal gates.

- Everyone talks about his own experience. The unknown always seems impossible, and what appears to be personally experienced the common lot. The fathers, who focused on the issue are unanimous in saying the following things: that celibacy is not natural to fallen man, it was natural to man before the fall (Gen.2: 25); after renewal of nature wrought by Christ, the ability to live in virginity and celibacy was made to man virginity and celibacy are superior to marriage, even if a couple's life is elevated by Christianity to a level higher than it was before the Incarnation (Eph.5, 32). The God-Man has led a life of virginity, the Holy Mother of God was and remained a virgin, the Holy Apostles John the Theologian, Paul, Barnabas, and doubtless many others were blank. With the advent of Christianity appeared armies of men and women virgins. This feat was rare before the renewal of nature through the Redeemer. With the Redeemer, God's kindness has spilled over men, as was precisely the angels sang (Luc2, 14), and sanctified by the many gifts of grace. The abundance of graces received by Christians is mentioned so picturesque in teaching that the priest must read according to the newlyweds Rule of the Church: "The great field of God, the great owner, is worked in three ways: it is also one of three ways he dons the fruit harvest time. The first part of this field is manipulated by those who love and keep it uncorrupted virginity until the end of their days, making a hundredfold the fruits of virtue for the Lord's granaries. The second part is manipulated by those who are temperate in widowhood and bear fruit more than sixty times. The third part is manipulated by those who live in marital union in leading a pious life, in fear of God, making fruitful field thirty times. In the same field are thus different sections and different fruits, all of which are blessed and praiseworthy, as intended. Ambrose says: we preach virginity so that widows are not released, and we honor the widows so that the marriage be kept with honor. "

- How the Christian knows if he may or may not lead a celibate life? In my opinion, this question should bother any candidate for the monastic life ...

- When you want, you can (Mt.19, 12). When the man was pure, he had the freedom to stay. And now, after the renewal of his nature, he himself decides to endorse the renewed nature in all its development , or enjoying only to a certain extent necessary for salvation, or remain in the fall and cultivating in him the fallen nature. The renewal of nature is a gift the Redeemer. For this reason, under any evangelical chosen by a good disposition but is given by Christ as a gift. The provision is good proven by the effort to acquire virtue, and virtue is finally obtained of God through constant prayer and patient. None of the evangelical virtues is to own fallen nature: the ascetic must always force himself, praying through tears and humility (Macarius the Great, 13.1). Like all virtues evangelical celibacy freely chosen. Like all other virtues, good provision must be proved by the struggle against the evil tendencies of fallen nature, the body control, and asceticism. The fallen nature will get the gift of purity when it will be conscious its inability to acquire this purity, and will throw in a fervent prayer, full of compunction. (John Cassian 4.5 & Greater Barsanuphius 2.55). The gift is sent by divine grace, which comes overshadow, change and renew nature. Thus explaining the ability of every man to celibacy, Blessed Theophylact of Bulgaria concluded by recalling that everyone who asks receives (Mt.7, 8). Examine the lives of saints, which describes the exploits against the tendencies of fallen nature, and you will see that all went from the normal state in which man is incapable of celibacy in the state in which celibacy is somehow second nature after a fierce battle against the desires of the flesh. You will see that their main weapons are prayer and tears. You will see blank away from the marriage of widows refrain from contracting a second marriage, but also rakes, lovers, criminals and unrepentant sinners ascend to the purity, incorruptibility, and holiness. I repeat: in the New Testament Church, countless virgins of both sexes, widowers and widows without blemish, and of dissolute women adulterers, prove incontestably the achievement of chastity is neither impossible nor as difficult as it appears in the eyes of theorists argue that without experience, and without knowing the moral tradition of the Church. These people examine and draw conclusions, say it openly, as depraved prejudice heavy and tough, who hated monasticism and, generally speaking, Orthodox Christianity. Are right to Saint Isidore of Pelusium wrote to St. Cyril, Patriarch of Alexandria, "the prejudice is blind and hate is completely blind." (more)